I would never risk $200 or any amount of money for that matter if success depended on 4chan doing something right. Think about it.

>>396

It is a gamble but keep in mind all the other chans would be doing it too

>>396
maybe if you avoid the cancerous boards, yea i know its 4chan, but i mean obvious ones like b and x

If you only replaced the handle and you actually got the head of it fixed (as in you had the pieces forged back together), then one could argue that it's still the same axe. But if you got a new head placed on the not-the-original handle, then it's now 2 for 2 on the "Not the Same Axe" scoreboard.

But then you have to consider the issue of the reanimated BODY having a NEW HEAD, implying that this is not the same head you lopped off. Unless the previous head's mind/brain was transferred elsewhere or absolutely destroyed and the body's original mind/brain was placed in the new head, you've got a bit of an issue here. Heck, you've STILL got an issue if you REPLACED the axe head instead of having the pieces reforged. If you had it reforged, he'd recognize it. But if you replaced it, then he'd only say that if he was crazy or if you bought a similar axe head.

And what if the new head came with its own mind/brain? What then? Well, maybe there's just some weird shit going on. Or maybe the head is just loopy and has weird fantasies about getting killed by decapitation and happened to imagine an axe similar to yours screaming towards his neck at some point.

Or MAYBE the guy you broke the handle on isn't the first person you slew, and New Head here recognizes the blade, PROVIDED you had it reforged instead of replaced.

And if you didn't slay New Head before? Well again, he's either crazy, there's weird shit going down, or there's something up with the axe head. If you never killed New Head, then there's no way he'd recognize that axe blade if it was reforged.

But what if you had it replaced? Well, I guess your "new" axe head was actually a "used" axe head, and McMillan & Sons Ax Mart ripped you off because they're saving up for a lowercase "e" to put in the store name.

Riddle solved. Not insane. Still don't know what this awful secret of yours is.

Is it the same axe? no. Is it the axe? yes.
The axe changed over time, it is no longer the exact same, but one of its former forms was indeed the same axe that once killed him.

Now in my opinion because he is alive, i think the answer must be no.

>>340

Never heard a cry for "Brainnnnnnnsssssssssss" before?

This could actually help advance civilization. During this blackout, we could find ways to design technologies that ran off of steam or the like. And I don't think it will transport the world to a 1700s era, more of the 1980s or early 90s.

It says the sunflares happen at peak every 22 years, and 11 years respecitively. Either
A.) The last time this happened was in 1991 (lol obviously didnt)
or
It's more overexagerated bullshit playing into the scare tactic of the news media. While Y2k actually could have happened (see 2008 massive Zune shutdown bug), and this probabaly could also happen, you are and idiot.

>>392
idiots,it happens every 22 years,just not always right were the earth is fucktard

>>364
Oh shit. We've got the technology to make Hedorah, but not Godzilla. WE'RE ALL FUCKED

>>96

Okay, so Lysenkoism is a deterministic view that tries to base its beliefs on science?

As for ID, I wouldn't say that just because trees, for example, look well-organized they must have a creator.
I believe that the Creator of the universe cannot be met, defined, analyzed or studied through science. Therefore, science will keep on searching and progressing, because -simply- the Creator cannot be found through such procedures.

>>1775
never fuck with MY soaring.

>380
tl'dr: Egyptians Invented the Scientific Method, it was perfected by the ancient greeks. I knew that already, simple answers for simple people. People on chans are retards, this is made for those retards.

>382
lol punctuation...
I've read the bible twice, but the bible is hardly relevant to my statements. The bible is a work of fiction, thus there is no truth in it.

>>382
>Have read the bible
>Posting on /id/

Hah funny stuff

I didn't take time to read the replies within this thread, so I apologize if a previous user has already stated the obvious. THe object of which you speak would hit it's terminal velocity. That is what is wrong with your hypothesis.

>>361
NAE FRICTION - NAE TERMINAL VELOCITY!

>227
No, timespace itself causes an object of mass to decelerate do to gravity. More mass, more inertia, more speed. More mass, more local gravity, less speed. This point of equilibrium is the speed of light. Just by having mass, the object has a finite speed.

Very nice OP free internets to you

>>342
How are you going to transport the lava/thermite without it burning through the container used to carry them? It would probably be better to use a material that is liquid at room temperature (or maybe above room temperature but below the liquefying temperature of lava) yet solidifies at the temperature in the Gulf.

>>345
this

>>345
implying that headtrama victims dont enter heaven, wtf. I mean, death is death. You dont fuckin...die better than other people...and then get an afterlife. fuck off.

>>348
implying there is transcending fairness in an unfair universe.

Certainly. Actions with consequences, independent of their setting or environment, are objectively right or wrong.

nope. wrong and right are human-created concepts

>>317
>this

>>309

But I could only guess at the function's end behavior. Knowing that f(x) was fairly simple, I tried using cubic then sine functions to satisfy the first given condition.

Then I tried f(x) = xsinx

f(xy) = xysin(xy)
x*f(y) + y*f(x) = xysiny + yxsinx

If only sinx + siny = sinxy.... but with logs, this would work. I tried f(x) = xlnx

f(xy) = xyln(xy) = xy(lnx + lny) = xylnx + xylny = y(xlnx) + x(ylny) = y*f(x) + x*f(y)

And just make it f(x) = 4xlnx to satisfy f'(1) =4.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>310

Notes:
1. A logarithm of any base can be used: f(x) = 4(lnb)xlog"b"x where log"b"x is the logarithm base b of x and where b is real and positive.
2. In my work, I obtained graph points for x = 0 and -1, but ultimately 4xlnx is undefined when x = 0 or x < 0. f(x) = 4xln|x| would have been a bit closer to what I was imagining, although f(x) = 4xlnx is all you need to solve the problem.

>>311

very nice, you win 2 points